June 15, 2009

What’s the one thing you think a small company starting up with social media should do? Read the answer by Duct Tape Marketing. Then for a truly simple way to set up a blog or website for your small business, use a DIY or custom template from HP Creative Studio.

Brand Strategy

When Choosing A Name, Think About The Story Behind It

John BattelleJohn Battelle | March 2nd, 2009 - 04:50 PM
(17) Found this useful. Do you? Yes

We humans are all wired for a great story. We love narrative, it’s how we relate to each other and the world. Over the course of the past 20 years I’ve been involved in naming a lot of new things – from the early days at Wired (more on that in a minute) to Web 2.0, to my current work at Federated Media. And as I review all the  names and brands I’ve been involved in starting or advising, one thing becomes crystal clear to me: the best names are ones that have a great story buried inside.

It’s often said that a brand is a “vessel waiting to be filled.” In other words, you can call a new product or service anything, and after a while, if your product is successful, that brand will come to mean whatever experience it ends up delivering. While I generally agree with the thesis, I’ve found that having a great story is a very good way to jumpstart a new brand, and a great way to help sell it and keep defining it in the long term.

A few examples. Let’s start with the first great name I had the pleasure of being involved with: Wired. I had nothing to do with naming Wired, that came from Louis Rosetto and his partner Jane Metcalfe. When Louis called me before launch, “Wired” was associated – to my mind anyway – with a book chronicling the life and rather sordid death of John Belushi. Being “wired” meant you had done a lot of drugs, and I wasn’t sure it was a great idea to associate anything with that concept.

But Louis and Jane were certain the brand would take off, mainly because they were plugged into a small but growing culture of digital counterculturalists who had appropriated the word to mean “connected to the digital revolution.” Sure, the druggy references were negative, but the idea was to turn the connotation on its ear – “Getting Wired” could mean a very good thing. And it fit what the brand delivered, a psychedelic melange of new ideas in design, technology, and culture. Every time Louis and Jane explained the story that Wired was going to cover, it became more and more evident that “Wired” was absolutely the right name for the magazine.

I learned from that experience that when it comes to naming, stick with what resonates with your core customer. That proved out in spades when it came time to name The Industry Standard. We were starting a new kind of magazine and website, one that was attempting to provide strong, hard hitting journalism to an industry flooded with hype and unchecked facts. It was also an industry without standards – from how advertising models might emerge to which technologies and policies would eventually win out. Over and over, as I told the story of what I wanted to start, the phrase “industry standards” became part of my pitch.

But I still didn’t have a name. I started a working group in email with a small number of close industry advisors, bouncing names off of them as I came up with them. We had some real dogs in there – “Internet Weekly News,” for example. I wanted the name to reflect both our journalistic ambitions as well as the challenges ahead for a new industry. I also didn’t want the name to limit the publication’s potential – I was adamant we not call it the “Internet” this or that, because who knew if that word would end up, eventually, being as ubiquitous (and meaningless) as, say, “electricity”?

Then one night while having dinner with two close industry pals, the name hit me as I was explaining my dilemma. “I want a name that has the credibility of great newspapers – words like Times, Herald, Standard – but also had the nuance and entendre of our industry…” The colleague I was speaking with looked at me with a huge grin on her face and uttered exactly what I was thinking: “The Industry Standard!”

I was instantly in love, but the initial response – from partners, investors, and even staff – was anything but supportive. But I stuck to my guns because I loved the story behind the name, and because the folks for whom I was creating the product – my core customers – really got it.  Over time, the name stuck, and I grew to love telling the story of its birth – it became part of our sales materials and our investment pitches.

Web 2 and Federated Media are also names that tell a story. With each, you can start with the name and work backwards to the core “argument” of what the business is all about. And this experience is not limited to companies I’ve been involved in – look at nearly every successful Internet company, and the name tells a story. Google, of course, is derived from “googol”, a number so large as to be unimaginable, and was chosen to reflect the vastness and potential of the search engine Larry Page and Sergey Brin were attempting to create. Yahoo, many might not know, is actually an acronym for “Yet Another Hierarchical Officious Oracle,” a name Jerry Yang and David Filo liked both because it reflected the fun and energy of trying to organize the entire web, and because as an acronym, well, it was just a lot of fun.

I could go on and on, but the main point is this: Great names turn into great stories, and vice versa. When you think about naming a new product or service of your own (or renaming one that perhaps needs a fresh take), start with the story you want that product to tell. Tell that story to yourself, your colleagues, anyone, over and over. Trust me, the name will come.

COMMENTS

  • 3/2/09 - Dave Whittle Says:

    You could also title this post “Brilliant Writer Learns Brilliant Marketing.” :-)

    The storyteller is the always the best salesman.

    It can take years to get the right name: even though I knew I had a great idea, because I had both David Pogue and John Dvorak on board with the concept, getting the team together didn’t take off until I came up with a tagline: “What’s Cool, What’s Hot, and What’s Not.” Even then, it took me months to realize that CoolHotNot would make a great brand. Once I snapped up the domain, everything fell into place for CoolHotNot.com and getting a great team all on board. Should be going live with the beta soon now, and with a name that’s easy to spell and easy to remember, it makes the concept that much easier to get.

    Team OS/2 (see Wikipedia) was also successful (as a concept at least, if not by its ultimate failure to stop Microsoft) largely because the name was instantly appealing to its audience and told a story all by itself.

    Great post, John.

    Dave Whittle

  • 3/2/09 - Randall Stickrod Says:

    Hey John – Well said. I have the same vivid memory of Louis coming back from Amsterdam and proudly telling me the name was going to be Wired. I had the same reaction — not because of the drug association, but because it was a term associated with a huge celebrity, written by a celebrity journalist. I have always admired Louis’ determination on that count. Not only did the magazine trump the book, but look how well it’s held up — and in a wireless world to boot!

  • 3/2/09 - John Battelle Says:

    thanks Randall and Dave, great to hear your input!

  • 3/3/09 - wannadevelop.com Says:

    Interesting reading and advice.

    Will have to give it a try on a few new and up-and-coming projects :)

    Mike

  • 3/3/09 - mark Says:

    Great read. I have been through this process many times, and when a group comes up with a name that instantly resonates well, its a magic moment.

    I am still surprised at how many people are still focused on early web type names, whether made up or made by dropping letters, regardless whether the fit or not.

    The branding reality is that the right name depends on what you are trying to accomplish.

    You listed some really great names that you have be successful with and I would argue that beyond the story, these names were appropriate to the company and business. That is the issue that I always need to work the hardest to get people to understand.

  • 3/3/09 - John Battelle Says:

    Mark – I recall that magic many, many times. “HotWired” – the name for the web version of Wired. “The Pacific”, the name I gave a magazine I started at UC Berkeley (also “The Big Story.”) “Foursquare” – a conference for the Quandrangle Group. Even more meaningful: the name I gave my first son – a VERY long story….not exactly branding, per se, but a great narrative!

  • 3/4/09 - Morning Edition - Mar 4, 2009 « Sazbean Says:

    [...] When Choosing A Name, Think About The Story Behind It (Small Business Marketing Guide) [...]

  • 3/4/09 - Wayne Philippe Says:

    John…after reading your article, it prompted me to think about a couple of products that were named 50 plus years ago and still are as relevant and fresh as the day they were launched i.e. the Hula Hoop and PlayDoh.

    Who would have guessed that a circular PVC tube and some wannabe modeling clay would receive such enduring descriptive names.

  • 3/6/09 - Tunde Says:

    Noteworthy Reminder:

    The name and the story should have resonance/meaning from the customer’s perspective not only yours.

  • 3/23/09 - Roundup: Developing Your Marketing Brand Strategy | Small Business Marketing Guide - Brought to you by HP Says:

    [...] You can read the full post here. [...]

  • 3/24/09 - victoryv Says:

    liked the article. enjoyed reading it.made me think a lot.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)